第63章（1 / 2）
[77]Theophanes 348，18.
[78]E.Caspar，‘Die Lateransynode von 649’，Zeitschr.f.Kirchengesch.51（1932），75-137.
[79]Cf.P.Peeters，Anal.Boll.51（1933），225 ff.
[80]Cf.A.Brilliantov，‘O meste konciny i pogrebenija sv.Maksima Ispovednika’（On the place of the death and burial of St.Maximus the Confessor），Christ.Vostok 6（1917），1-62.
[81]Cf.，for instance，Acta Maximi，c.4，Migne，PG 90，117 BC.
[82]Chronica Minora，Scriptores Syri Ⅳ，55.Cf.also Scylitzes-Cedrenus Ⅰ，762.
[83]Cf.Hartmann，Geschichte Italiens im Mittelalter Ⅱ，1（1900），248 ff.；Brooks，CMH Ⅱ（1911），394 ff.；Kulakovskij，Istorija Ⅲ，221 ff.
[84]Theophanes 348，4;351，14.
[85]Theoph.352 says that，after the murder of his father，Constantine Ⅳ led a force to Sicily in person and this is ofter accepted in modern works，but it has been pointed out that it is erroneous by E.W.Brooks，‘The Sicilian expedition of Constantine Ⅳ’，BZ 17（1908），455-9;cf.also CMH Ⅱ（1913），395，and Kulakovskij，Istorija Ⅲ，235 and 358.H.Grégoire，B 13（1938），170，has attempted to justify Theophanes’account，but Brooks’view still seems to me to be the more probable.
[86]Cf.Kulakovskij，Istorija Ⅲ，232 f.
[87]Thus the siege of Constantinople lasted five years（674-8）.Theoph.354 and Nicephorus 32 maintained that the struggle for Constantinople lasted seven years，although Theoph.himself（355 ff.）puts the peace treaty in the year 678.Apparently both the chroniclers reckoned from the capture of Cyzicus，as is pointed out by Gibbon，ed.Bury，Ⅵ2，note 1.
[88]On Greek fire see C.Zenghelis，‘Le feu grégeois et les armes à feu des Byzantins’，B 7（1932），265 ff.The older literature is given by Vasiliev，History 214，note 57.According to Zenghelis the main ingredient was saltpetre，so that Callinicus’discovery anticipated the later invention of gunpowder.
[89]Dolger，Reg.239.
[90]Theophanes 356（cf.Nicephorus 33）.Cf.Sisic，Povijest 270 f.，who is doubtless right in thinking that the wordsrefer to the leaders of the Slav tribes in the Byzantine West，and thatimplies Slav recognition of the authority of the Byzantine Emperor in return for which he confirmed their possession of the lands which they were occupying.
[91]Cf.J.Moravcsik，‘Zur Geschichte der Onoguren’，Ungarische Jahrb.10（1930），53 ff.，and the full bibliography in Byzantinoturcica Ⅰ，2nd ed.，112 ff.
↑返回顶部↑
[78]E.Caspar，‘Die Lateransynode von 649’，Zeitschr.f.Kirchengesch.51（1932），75-137.
[79]Cf.P.Peeters，Anal.Boll.51（1933），225 ff.
[80]Cf.A.Brilliantov，‘O meste konciny i pogrebenija sv.Maksima Ispovednika’（On the place of the death and burial of St.Maximus the Confessor），Christ.Vostok 6（1917），1-62.
[81]Cf.，for instance，Acta Maximi，c.4，Migne，PG 90，117 BC.
[82]Chronica Minora，Scriptores Syri Ⅳ，55.Cf.also Scylitzes-Cedrenus Ⅰ，762.
[83]Cf.Hartmann，Geschichte Italiens im Mittelalter Ⅱ，1（1900），248 ff.；Brooks，CMH Ⅱ（1911），394 ff.；Kulakovskij，Istorija Ⅲ，221 ff.
[84]Theophanes 348，4;351，14.
[85]Theoph.352 says that，after the murder of his father，Constantine Ⅳ led a force to Sicily in person and this is ofter accepted in modern works，but it has been pointed out that it is erroneous by E.W.Brooks，‘The Sicilian expedition of Constantine Ⅳ’，BZ 17（1908），455-9;cf.also CMH Ⅱ（1913），395，and Kulakovskij，Istorija Ⅲ，235 and 358.H.Grégoire，B 13（1938），170，has attempted to justify Theophanes’account，but Brooks’view still seems to me to be the more probable.
[86]Cf.Kulakovskij，Istorija Ⅲ，232 f.
[87]Thus the siege of Constantinople lasted five years（674-8）.Theoph.354 and Nicephorus 32 maintained that the struggle for Constantinople lasted seven years，although Theoph.himself（355 ff.）puts the peace treaty in the year 678.Apparently both the chroniclers reckoned from the capture of Cyzicus，as is pointed out by Gibbon，ed.Bury，Ⅵ2，note 1.
[88]On Greek fire see C.Zenghelis，‘Le feu grégeois et les armes à feu des Byzantins’，B 7（1932），265 ff.The older literature is given by Vasiliev，History 214，note 57.According to Zenghelis the main ingredient was saltpetre，so that Callinicus’discovery anticipated the later invention of gunpowder.
[89]Dolger，Reg.239.
[90]Theophanes 356（cf.Nicephorus 33）.Cf.Sisic，Povijest 270 f.，who is doubtless right in thinking that the wordsrefer to the leaders of the Slav tribes in the Byzantine West，and thatimplies Slav recognition of the authority of the Byzantine Emperor in return for which he confirmed their possession of the lands which they were occupying.
[91]Cf.J.Moravcsik，‘Zur Geschichte der Onoguren’，Ungarische Jahrb.10（1930），53 ff.，and the full bibliography in Byzantinoturcica Ⅰ，2nd ed.，112 ff.
↑返回顶部↑