第86章（1 / 2）
[40]Duchesne，Liber Pontif.391.Cf.Kulakovskij，Istorija Ⅲ，309，note 2，contrary to Bury，BZ 5（1896），570 f.
[41]Cf.Grabar，Iconoclsme，42 ff.
[42]Agathon Diac，Mansi 12，193 E-196 A.
[43]Theophanes 385 f.Cf.Kulakovskij，Istorija Ⅲ，414 ff.
[44]He originated in Germaniceia in North Syria.K.Schenk，BZ 5（1896），296 ff.，shows that the wordsin the chronicle of Theophanes（p.391）are a later addition.I agree with this view，though some scholars support the Isaurian ancestry，e.g.Kulakovskij，Istorija Ⅲ，319，note 2，who relies on the tradition that at baptism Leo received the‘typically Isaurian’name of Conon.Pope Conon（686-7）was，however，certainly no Isaurian，but according to the Liber Pontificalis‘natione grecus，oriundus parte Tracesio，edocatus apud Siciliam’。
[45]A detailed description of the siege，drawing on all the sources and relevant literature，is given by R.Guilland，‘Lexpédition de Maslama contre Constantinople（717-18）’，Etudes byzantines，Paris 1959，109 ff.
[46]For the friendly relations between Byzantium and the Khazars in the eighth century see Vasiliev，The Goths in the Crimea（1936），87.
[47]See above，pp.95 ff.and p.100，note 3.A strategus of the Thracesion theme occurs for the first time in 741（Theophanes 414）.Cf.Diehl，‘Régime des thémes’282，and Gelzer，‘Themenverfassung’77 f.
[48]A strategus of the Bucellarion theme occurs for the first time in 767（Theophanes 440）.Cf.Gelzer，‘Themenverfassung’79.
[49]By 710 there is mention of a patricius et stratigos caravisionorum（Liber Pont.390）；in 732 the strategus of the Cibyraeots appears（Theophanes 410）.Cf.Diehl，‘Régime des thèmes’280 ff.；Gelzer，‘Themenverfassung’34;R.Guilland，‘Etudes de titulature et de prosopographie byzantines.Les chefs de la marine byzantine’，BZ 44（1951）（Dolger-Festschrift）212.
[50]A strategus of Crete is mentioned in the Vita of Stephen the Young（♀767），Migne，PG 100，col.1164.The credit for drawing attention to this passage belongs to G.Spyridakis，，EEBS 21（1951），59 ff.，who would like to assume that Crete received the rank of theme under Leo Ⅲ.Cf.also H.Glykatzi-Ahrweiler，‘Ladministration militaire de la Crète byzantine，’B 31（1961），217 ff.，who is probably right in supposing that Crete was previously subject to an archon and formed an archontate.
[51]For a long time it was generally held by Byzantinists that Leo Ⅲ was responsible for a fundamental reorganization of the themes as well as of other aspects of Byzantine administration，but this does not receive the slightest support from the sources.Cf.my arguments in‘Uber die vermeintliche Reformtatigkeit der Isaurier’，BZ 30（1929-30），394 ff.Ch.Diehl.Le monde oriental de 395 à 1081（1936），255 f.，attempts to revive the old theory，but in describing Leo Ⅲ’s‘work of reorganization’he relies on thewhile admitting（p.256）that they cannot be attributed to Leo with any certainty（on these laws cf.above，p.90 f.）。
[52]For the dates see above under Sources，p.152，note 5，where bibliography is also given.
[53]R.S.Lopez，‘Byzantine Law in the Seventh Century and its Reception by the Germans and the Arabs’，B 16（1942-3），445 ff.，thinks that it is possible to assume that this customary law had been written down as early as Heraclius’day and that it would have influenced both Arab and Germanic law.
[54]Zepos，Jus Ⅱ，16.
↑返回顶部↑
[41]Cf.Grabar，Iconoclsme，42 ff.
[42]Agathon Diac，Mansi 12，193 E-196 A.
[43]Theophanes 385 f.Cf.Kulakovskij，Istorija Ⅲ，414 ff.
[44]He originated in Germaniceia in North Syria.K.Schenk，BZ 5（1896），296 ff.，shows that the wordsin the chronicle of Theophanes（p.391）are a later addition.I agree with this view，though some scholars support the Isaurian ancestry，e.g.Kulakovskij，Istorija Ⅲ，319，note 2，who relies on the tradition that at baptism Leo received the‘typically Isaurian’name of Conon.Pope Conon（686-7）was，however，certainly no Isaurian，but according to the Liber Pontificalis‘natione grecus，oriundus parte Tracesio，edocatus apud Siciliam’。
[45]A detailed description of the siege，drawing on all the sources and relevant literature，is given by R.Guilland，‘Lexpédition de Maslama contre Constantinople（717-18）’，Etudes byzantines，Paris 1959，109 ff.
[46]For the friendly relations between Byzantium and the Khazars in the eighth century see Vasiliev，The Goths in the Crimea（1936），87.
[47]See above，pp.95 ff.and p.100，note 3.A strategus of the Thracesion theme occurs for the first time in 741（Theophanes 414）.Cf.Diehl，‘Régime des thémes’282，and Gelzer，‘Themenverfassung’77 f.
[48]A strategus of the Bucellarion theme occurs for the first time in 767（Theophanes 440）.Cf.Gelzer，‘Themenverfassung’79.
[49]By 710 there is mention of a patricius et stratigos caravisionorum（Liber Pont.390）；in 732 the strategus of the Cibyraeots appears（Theophanes 410）.Cf.Diehl，‘Régime des thèmes’280 ff.；Gelzer，‘Themenverfassung’34;R.Guilland，‘Etudes de titulature et de prosopographie byzantines.Les chefs de la marine byzantine’，BZ 44（1951）（Dolger-Festschrift）212.
[50]A strategus of Crete is mentioned in the Vita of Stephen the Young（♀767），Migne，PG 100，col.1164.The credit for drawing attention to this passage belongs to G.Spyridakis，，EEBS 21（1951），59 ff.，who would like to assume that Crete received the rank of theme under Leo Ⅲ.Cf.also H.Glykatzi-Ahrweiler，‘Ladministration militaire de la Crète byzantine，’B 31（1961），217 ff.，who is probably right in supposing that Crete was previously subject to an archon and formed an archontate.
[51]For a long time it was generally held by Byzantinists that Leo Ⅲ was responsible for a fundamental reorganization of the themes as well as of other aspects of Byzantine administration，but this does not receive the slightest support from the sources.Cf.my arguments in‘Uber die vermeintliche Reformtatigkeit der Isaurier’，BZ 30（1929-30），394 ff.Ch.Diehl.Le monde oriental de 395 à 1081（1936），255 f.，attempts to revive the old theory，but in describing Leo Ⅲ’s‘work of reorganization’he relies on thewhile admitting（p.256）that they cannot be attributed to Leo with any certainty（on these laws cf.above，p.90 f.）。
[52]For the dates see above under Sources，p.152，note 5，where bibliography is also given.
[53]R.S.Lopez，‘Byzantine Law in the Seventh Century and its Reception by the Germans and the Arabs’，B 16（1942-3），445 ff.，thinks that it is possible to assume that this customary law had been written down as early as Heraclius’day and that it would have influenced both Arab and Germanic law.
[54]Zepos，Jus Ⅱ，16.
↑返回顶部↑