第196章（1 / 2）
[84]Dolger，Reg.1931.
[85]Like Longnon，Empire latin 232 f.，I have kept the traditional chronology based on the information in the Chronicle of the Morea;the criticisms of Dragoumis，（Athens 1921），177，and Zakythinos，Despotat Ⅰ，41 ff.，seem unsatisfactory.
[86]Cf.Dolger，Reg.1934，1941，1960.
[87]Cf.J.Gay，‘Notes sur le second royaume francais de Sicile’，Mélanges Jorga（1933），309 ff.
[88]Cf.Longnon，Empire latin 236 f.
[89]Cf.the excellent comments in Norden，Papsttum und Byzanz 443 ff.
[90]V.Laurent，‘La croisade et la question d’Orient sous le pontificat de Grégoire Ⅹ’，Revue hist.du Sud-Est Europ.22（1945），105，gives a detailed description of Gregory Ⅹs’eastern policy with strong emphasis on his crusading projects.Cf.idem，‘Grégoire Ⅹ et un projet de ligue anti-turque’，EO 37（1938），257 ff.，and‘Le rapport de Georges le Métochite，apocrisiaire de Michel Ⅷ Paléologue auprès du pape Grégoire Ⅹ（1275-6）’，Revue hist.du Sud-Est Europ.23（1946），233 ff.；A.Fliche，‘Le problème oriental au second concile oecuménique de Lyon（1274）’，OCP 13（1947），475，does not in fact contribute anything new.
[91]V.N.Benesevic，Opisanie greceskich rukopisej sv.Ekateriny na Sinae（A description of the Greek manuscripts of St.Catharine’s monastery on Mt.Sinai），St.Petersburg 1911-17，vol.Ⅰ，3，1，pp.542 ff.
[92]Pachym.Ⅰ，318 f.；prostagma of Michael Ⅷ of 8 November 1272，Heisenberg，‘Palaiologenzeit’37 ff.（with detailed commentary）；Dolger，Reg.1994 and 1995.
[93]Cf.F.Uspenskij，‘Vizantijskie istoriki o mongolach i egipetskich mamljukach’（Byzantine historians on the Mongols and Egyptian Mamluks），ⅤⅤ24（1923-6），1 ff.；G.Vernadskij，‘Zolotaja Orda，Egipet i Vizantija v ich vzaimootnosenijach v carstvovanie Michaila Paleologa’（The Golden Horde，Egypt and Byzantium and their relations in the reign of Michael Palaeologus），Sem.Kond.1（1927），73 ff.
[94]Cf.Stanley Lane-Poole，A History of Egypt in the Middle Ages（1901），242 ff.；A.Poliak，‘Le caractère colonial de l’Etat Mamelouk dans ses rapports avec la Horde d’Or’，Revue des Atudes islamiques 1935，231 ff.
[95]Nic.Gregoras Ⅰ，101.
[96]Chronological indications in the sources are very infrequent.Cf.Dolger，Reg.1969，1976，1977.The chronology given here is based on the connection between the various events described：the alliance with Nogaj cannot have been before 1272 since it was preceded by the Tartar attack invoked by John of Thessaly which occurred in 1271 at the earliest and the Bulgar-Byzantine war which could hardly have broken out before the spring of 1272，as between the death of the tzarina Irene Lascaris in 1270 and this war the tzar’s marriage with the Emperor’s niece Mary and the subsequent birth of a son has to be fitted in.
[97]Cf.Norden，Papsttum und Byzanz 489 ff.
[98]Cf.Jirecek，Geschichte Ⅰ，323.
↑返回顶部↑
[85]Like Longnon，Empire latin 232 f.，I have kept the traditional chronology based on the information in the Chronicle of the Morea;the criticisms of Dragoumis，（Athens 1921），177，and Zakythinos，Despotat Ⅰ，41 ff.，seem unsatisfactory.
[86]Cf.Dolger，Reg.1934，1941，1960.
[87]Cf.J.Gay，‘Notes sur le second royaume francais de Sicile’，Mélanges Jorga（1933），309 ff.
[88]Cf.Longnon，Empire latin 236 f.
[89]Cf.the excellent comments in Norden，Papsttum und Byzanz 443 ff.
[90]V.Laurent，‘La croisade et la question d’Orient sous le pontificat de Grégoire Ⅹ’，Revue hist.du Sud-Est Europ.22（1945），105，gives a detailed description of Gregory Ⅹs’eastern policy with strong emphasis on his crusading projects.Cf.idem，‘Grégoire Ⅹ et un projet de ligue anti-turque’，EO 37（1938），257 ff.，and‘Le rapport de Georges le Métochite，apocrisiaire de Michel Ⅷ Paléologue auprès du pape Grégoire Ⅹ（1275-6）’，Revue hist.du Sud-Est Europ.23（1946），233 ff.；A.Fliche，‘Le problème oriental au second concile oecuménique de Lyon（1274）’，OCP 13（1947），475，does not in fact contribute anything new.
[91]V.N.Benesevic，Opisanie greceskich rukopisej sv.Ekateriny na Sinae（A description of the Greek manuscripts of St.Catharine’s monastery on Mt.Sinai），St.Petersburg 1911-17，vol.Ⅰ，3，1，pp.542 ff.
[92]Pachym.Ⅰ，318 f.；prostagma of Michael Ⅷ of 8 November 1272，Heisenberg，‘Palaiologenzeit’37 ff.（with detailed commentary）；Dolger，Reg.1994 and 1995.
[93]Cf.F.Uspenskij，‘Vizantijskie istoriki o mongolach i egipetskich mamljukach’（Byzantine historians on the Mongols and Egyptian Mamluks），ⅤⅤ24（1923-6），1 ff.；G.Vernadskij，‘Zolotaja Orda，Egipet i Vizantija v ich vzaimootnosenijach v carstvovanie Michaila Paleologa’（The Golden Horde，Egypt and Byzantium and their relations in the reign of Michael Palaeologus），Sem.Kond.1（1927），73 ff.
[94]Cf.Stanley Lane-Poole，A History of Egypt in the Middle Ages（1901），242 ff.；A.Poliak，‘Le caractère colonial de l’Etat Mamelouk dans ses rapports avec la Horde d’Or’，Revue des Atudes islamiques 1935，231 ff.
[95]Nic.Gregoras Ⅰ，101.
[96]Chronological indications in the sources are very infrequent.Cf.Dolger，Reg.1969，1976，1977.The chronology given here is based on the connection between the various events described：the alliance with Nogaj cannot have been before 1272 since it was preceded by the Tartar attack invoked by John of Thessaly which occurred in 1271 at the earliest and the Bulgar-Byzantine war which could hardly have broken out before the spring of 1272，as between the death of the tzarina Irene Lascaris in 1270 and this war the tzar’s marriage with the Emperor’s niece Mary and the subsequent birth of a son has to be fitted in.
[97]Cf.Norden，Papsttum und Byzanz 489 ff.
[98]Cf.Jirecek，Geschichte Ⅰ，323.
↑返回顶部↑