第230章（1 / 2）
[18]Critical edition with introduction and commentary by O.Lampsides，，Athens 1958.
[19]Detailed research into the manuscript tradition of the correspondence has been done by W.Lameere，La tradition manuscrite de la Correspondance de Grégoire de Chypre，Brussels-Rome 1937;the text of the autobiography with a French trans.is also given here（pp.176-91），but unfortunately Lameere has not done a new edition of the letters.The edition of（1910）is inaccessible to me，but as Lameere，7 ff.，shows，it is very incomplete and based on inadequate examination of the manuscripts.The two orations eulogizing Michael Ⅷ and Andronicus Ⅱ were published by Fr.Boissonade，Anecdota Graeca Ⅰ，313-93.The collected works are in Migne，PG 142，20-469，where the theological works against the Latin doctrine and the supporters of the ecclesiastical union are printed together with the autobiography and the panegyrics.
[20]On his life，his political activity and his literary work cf.the detailed study of J.Verpeaux，Nicéphore Choumnos，homme d’Etat et humaniste byzantin（c.1250/5-1327），Paris 1959.
[21]Most of the known writiings of Nicephorus Chumnus can be found in Fr.Boissonade，Anecdota Graeca Ⅰ，Ⅱ，Ⅲ，Ⅴ.The documents mentioned are also in Zepos，Jus Ⅰ，558 ff.and 549 ff.Cf.also‘Actes de l’Athos’17 Nr.26.Cf.the full information，including a list of his works in manuscript in J.Verpeaux，op.cit.，17 ff.
[22]Migne，PG 145，447-548.
[23]The report of the embassy is given in Sathas，（1872），154-93.Most of the rhetorical works are still unedited，but there is，however，a eulogy on Nicaea in Sathas Ⅰ，139-53.The Miscellanea，the main work of Metochites，is in the old edition of Chr.G.Müller and Th.Kiessling，Th.Metochitae Miscellanea philosophica et historica，Leipzig 1821.Of the twenty poems so far known，only three have been edited by M.Treu，Dichtungen d.Grosslogotheten Theodoros Metochites，Gymnasial-Progr.Potsdam 1895（the first poem giving detailed information on Metochites’life is particularly important），and by R.Guilland，‘Le palais de Théodore Métochite’，Rev.des Etudes grecques 35（1922），82.On the unedited poems cf.R.Guilland，‘Les Poésies inédites de Théodore Métochite’，B 3（1926），265 ff.；idem，Correspondance de Nicéphore Grégoras 358 ff.；An evaluation of Metochites and his work as a whole is made by H.G.Beck，Theodore Metochites.Die Krise des byzantinischen Weltbildes in 14.Jahrhundert，Munich 1952.Of equal importance both for Metochites and for Chumnus，as well as for the intellectual life of the period，is the penetrating study by Ⅰ.Sevcenko，?tudes sur la polémique entre Théodore Métochite et Nicéphore Choumnos，Brussels，1962.
[24]Fr.Boissonade，Anecdota Graeca Ⅴ，159-82;M.Treu，BZ 5（1896），546 f.
[25]L.Previale，‘Un panegirico inedito per Michele Ⅷ Paleologo’，BZ 42（1942），1 ff.
[26]E.Miller，Manuelis Philae carmina，2 vols.，Paris 1855-7;A.Martini，Manuelis Philae carmina inedita，Naples 1900.
[27]G.Cammelli，Démétrius Cydonès，Correspondance，Paris 1930，gives a selection of fifty letters，with French trans.and a valuable biographical introduction.Cf.the important comments of G.Mercati，‘Per l’epistolario di Demetrio Cidone’，Studi bizant.e neoell.3（1931），203 ff.，and his extremely valuable work，Notizie di Procoro e Demetrio Cidone…ed altri appunti（Studi e testi 56，Vatican 1931），containing several other letters and important writings.The autobiography of Demetrius Cydones published in this collection（359 ff.），has been translated by H.G.Beck，Ostkirchliche Studien I（1952），208-25;264-82.Cf.also the successful treatment of Loenertz，‘M.Paléologue et D.Cydonès’，and particularly Loenertz，Lettres de D.Cydonès，where there is a very thorough investigation into the whole manuscript tradition as the preliminary to a complete edition of the correspondence，as well as an edition of five more letters and two minor writings.Now cf.the edition that has recently been published by R.J.Loenertz，Démétrius Cydlonès，Correspondence I，II，Studi e Testi 186（1956）and 208（1960）。
[28]G.Cammellii，‘Demetrii Cydonii orationes tres，adhuc ineditae’，BNJ 3（1922），67 ff.and 4（1923），77 ff.，282 ff.
[29]Migne，PG 109，640 ff.；154，961 ff.，1009 ff.
[30]Zacharia von Lingenthal，‘Prooemien zu Chrysobullen von D.Cydones’，S.B.d.Preuss.Akad.1888，1409 ff.Cf.also Sp.Lampros，‘Ein Proomium zu einem Chrysobull von D.Kydones’，BZ 5（1896），339 f.
[31]Edited by R.-J.Loenertz，Correspondance de Manuel Calécas（Studi e Test 152，1950），with detailed biographical introduction and very useful prosopographical information on M.Calecas’correspondents.
[32]An important part of the hesychast and anti-hesychast writings still remains unedited.What has so far been published is available for the most part in Migne，PG 150 and 151.Three important writings of Gregory Palamas have been published and translated by J.Meyendorff，Grégoire Palamas，Défense des saints hésychastes，Louvain 1959.A closerinsight into both the edited and unedited hesychast and anti-hesychast works is givenby the important work of Meyendorff，Palamas.Cf.also Beck，Kirche，712 ff.
↑返回顶部↑
[19]Detailed research into the manuscript tradition of the correspondence has been done by W.Lameere，La tradition manuscrite de la Correspondance de Grégoire de Chypre，Brussels-Rome 1937;the text of the autobiography with a French trans.is also given here（pp.176-91），but unfortunately Lameere has not done a new edition of the letters.The edition of（1910）is inaccessible to me，but as Lameere，7 ff.，shows，it is very incomplete and based on inadequate examination of the manuscripts.The two orations eulogizing Michael Ⅷ and Andronicus Ⅱ were published by Fr.Boissonade，Anecdota Graeca Ⅰ，313-93.The collected works are in Migne，PG 142，20-469，where the theological works against the Latin doctrine and the supporters of the ecclesiastical union are printed together with the autobiography and the panegyrics.
[20]On his life，his political activity and his literary work cf.the detailed study of J.Verpeaux，Nicéphore Choumnos，homme d’Etat et humaniste byzantin（c.1250/5-1327），Paris 1959.
[21]Most of the known writiings of Nicephorus Chumnus can be found in Fr.Boissonade，Anecdota Graeca Ⅰ，Ⅱ，Ⅲ，Ⅴ.The documents mentioned are also in Zepos，Jus Ⅰ，558 ff.and 549 ff.Cf.also‘Actes de l’Athos’17 Nr.26.Cf.the full information，including a list of his works in manuscript in J.Verpeaux，op.cit.，17 ff.
[22]Migne，PG 145，447-548.
[23]The report of the embassy is given in Sathas，（1872），154-93.Most of the rhetorical works are still unedited，but there is，however，a eulogy on Nicaea in Sathas Ⅰ，139-53.The Miscellanea，the main work of Metochites，is in the old edition of Chr.G.Müller and Th.Kiessling，Th.Metochitae Miscellanea philosophica et historica，Leipzig 1821.Of the twenty poems so far known，only three have been edited by M.Treu，Dichtungen d.Grosslogotheten Theodoros Metochites，Gymnasial-Progr.Potsdam 1895（the first poem giving detailed information on Metochites’life is particularly important），and by R.Guilland，‘Le palais de Théodore Métochite’，Rev.des Etudes grecques 35（1922），82.On the unedited poems cf.R.Guilland，‘Les Poésies inédites de Théodore Métochite’，B 3（1926），265 ff.；idem，Correspondance de Nicéphore Grégoras 358 ff.；An evaluation of Metochites and his work as a whole is made by H.G.Beck，Theodore Metochites.Die Krise des byzantinischen Weltbildes in 14.Jahrhundert，Munich 1952.Of equal importance both for Metochites and for Chumnus，as well as for the intellectual life of the period，is the penetrating study by Ⅰ.Sevcenko，?tudes sur la polémique entre Théodore Métochite et Nicéphore Choumnos，Brussels，1962.
[24]Fr.Boissonade，Anecdota Graeca Ⅴ，159-82;M.Treu，BZ 5（1896），546 f.
[25]L.Previale，‘Un panegirico inedito per Michele Ⅷ Paleologo’，BZ 42（1942），1 ff.
[26]E.Miller，Manuelis Philae carmina，2 vols.，Paris 1855-7;A.Martini，Manuelis Philae carmina inedita，Naples 1900.
[27]G.Cammelli，Démétrius Cydonès，Correspondance，Paris 1930，gives a selection of fifty letters，with French trans.and a valuable biographical introduction.Cf.the important comments of G.Mercati，‘Per l’epistolario di Demetrio Cidone’，Studi bizant.e neoell.3（1931），203 ff.，and his extremely valuable work，Notizie di Procoro e Demetrio Cidone…ed altri appunti（Studi e testi 56，Vatican 1931），containing several other letters and important writings.The autobiography of Demetrius Cydones published in this collection（359 ff.），has been translated by H.G.Beck，Ostkirchliche Studien I（1952），208-25;264-82.Cf.also the successful treatment of Loenertz，‘M.Paléologue et D.Cydonès’，and particularly Loenertz，Lettres de D.Cydonès，where there is a very thorough investigation into the whole manuscript tradition as the preliminary to a complete edition of the correspondence，as well as an edition of five more letters and two minor writings.Now cf.the edition that has recently been published by R.J.Loenertz，Démétrius Cydlonès，Correspondence I，II，Studi e Testi 186（1956）and 208（1960）。
[28]G.Cammellii，‘Demetrii Cydonii orationes tres，adhuc ineditae’，BNJ 3（1922），67 ff.and 4（1923），77 ff.，282 ff.
[29]Migne，PG 109，640 ff.；154，961 ff.，1009 ff.
[30]Zacharia von Lingenthal，‘Prooemien zu Chrysobullen von D.Cydones’，S.B.d.Preuss.Akad.1888，1409 ff.Cf.also Sp.Lampros，‘Ein Proomium zu einem Chrysobull von D.Kydones’，BZ 5（1896），339 f.
[31]Edited by R.-J.Loenertz，Correspondance de Manuel Calécas（Studi e Test 152，1950），with detailed biographical introduction and very useful prosopographical information on M.Calecas’correspondents.
[32]An important part of the hesychast and anti-hesychast writings still remains unedited.What has so far been published is available for the most part in Migne，PG 150 and 151.Three important writings of Gregory Palamas have been published and translated by J.Meyendorff，Grégoire Palamas，Défense des saints hésychastes，Louvain 1959.A closerinsight into both the edited and unedited hesychast and anti-hesychast works is givenby the important work of Meyendorff，Palamas.Cf.also Beck，Kirche，712 ff.
↑返回顶部↑