第229章（1 / 1）
[10]Cf.E.Cernousov，‘Duka，odin iz istorikov konca Vizantii’（Ducas，one of the historians of the Byzantine downfall），VV 21（1914），171 ff.；W.Miller，‘The Historians Doukas and Phrantzes’，JHS 46（1926），63 ff.；V.Grecu，Pour une meilleure connaissance de l’historien Doukas’，Mémorial L.Petit（1948），128 ff.Further bibliography in Moravcsik，Byzantinoturcica Ⅰ，2nd ed.，250 ff.
[11]Müller，FHG，v（1870），40-161;English translation，C.T.Riggs，History of Mehmed the Conqueror by Kritovoulos，Princeton;1954;a critical edition of Critobulus，with an introduction and translation in Rumanian has been published by V.Grecu，Critobuli Imbriotae De rebus per annos 1451-1467 a Mechemete Ⅱ gestis，Editio Acad.Reip.Pop.Romaniae，1963.On Critobulus and his work see J.Radonic，‘Kritovul，vizantijskiistorik XV v.’（Critobulus，a Byzantine historian of the fifteenth century），Glas Srpske Kralj Akad.138（1930），59 ff.；Z.V.Udalcova，‘Vizantijskij istorik Kritovul o juznych slavjanach i drugich narodach Balkanskogo poluostrova v XV v.’（The Byzantine historian Critobulus on the southern Slavs and other Balkan peoples in the XVth century），VV 4（1951），91 ff.See also Moravcsik，Byzantinoturcica Ⅰ，2nd ed.，434 ff.
[12]The account of the fall of Constantinople given by the four Byzantine historians is to be found printed all together with an introduction in N.Tomadakes，（1453）。，Athens，1953.A.German translation of the account from the Chronicon Maius attributed to Sphrantzes，with introduction and commentary，is given by E.v.Ivanka，Die letzten Tage von Konstantinopel in Byz.Geschichtsschreiber Ⅰ，Graz-Vienna Cologne，1954.For a Russian translation of the accounts of pseudo-Sphrantzes and Ducas see A.A.Stepanov，‘Vizantijskie istoriki Duka i Frandzi o padenii Konstantinopolia’（The Byzantine Historians Ducas and Phrantzes on the Fall of Constantinople），VV 7（1953），385-430.
An extensive chronicle of the Turkish Sultans up to 1512，written in the Greek vernacular and preserved in the Codex Barberinus gr.111，has been published by G.Zoras，‘Athens，1958.But，as has been shown by E.A.Zachariadou，14（1960），this chronicle goes back to an Italian original.
[13]Nicolo Barbaro，Giornale dell’assedio di Constantinopoli 1453，ed.E.Cornet，Vienna 1856.Special attention should be given to the account which Leonard of Chios sent on 16 August 1453 to Pope Nicholas V;cf.Gy.Moravcsik，‘Bericht des Leonardus Chiensisüber den Fall von Konstantinopel in einer vulgargriechischen Quelle’，BZ 44（1951）（Dolger-Festschrift），428 ff.There is also the interesting account of the Russian Nestor Iskander who took part in the battle for Constantinople on the Turkish side;cf.N.A.Smirnov，‘Istoriceskoe znacene russkoj’Povesti’Nestora Iskandera o vzjatii turkami Konstantinopolja v 1453 g.’（The historical significance of the Russian‘Relatio’of Nestor Iskander about the capture of Constantinople by the Turks in 1453），VV 7（1953），50 ff.For other accounts of the fall of Constantinople by non-Greek eye－witnesses cf.the list in Gibbon-Bury.Ⅶ，332 ff.，and Vasiliev，History（1952），649.On the accounts of the Turkish sources cf.A.Moschopoulos，‘Le siège et la prise de Constantinople selon les sources turques’，Le Cinq-centième anniversaire de la prise de Constantinople，Athens 1953，23 ff.
[14]An important chronicle stretching to 1391，published by J.Müller，‘Byzantinische Analekten’，S.B.d.Wiener Akad.Ⅸ，1852，389 ff.This chronicle is given in a shortened form（omitting the beginning covering the years 1204 to 1282 which is practically valueless）by Lampros-Amantos，Nr.52，pp.88 ff.；cf.also Nr.15，pp.31 ff.This collection contains a number of other chronicles which give information of great imoprtance on the chronology of the Paiaeologian period.Valuable critical comments on this edition are given by P.Wittek，B 12（1937），309 ff.Charanis，‘Short Chronicle’，gives a useful historcal commentary on the.A similar chronicle of significance going to 1352 has been published from a Moscow manuscript by B.Gorjanov，VV 2（1949），276 ff.，with a Russian trans.It is prefaced by an introduction which unfortunately shows no acquaintance with the many other known sources of this type，while the edition of the text and the translation leave much to be desired.A further short chronicle with interesting information on the second half of the fourteenth and the first half of the fifteenth centuries has recently been published by R.J.Loenertz，‘Chronicon breve de Graecorum imperatoribus，ab anno 1341 ad annum 1453 codice Vaticano Graeco 162’，EEBS 28（1958），204 ff.Cf.also the‘Chronicon breve Thessalonicense’published by Loenertz in Démétrius Cydonès，Correspondence Ⅰ，Studi e Testi 186（1956），174，and his article，‘Chroniques breves byzantines’，OCP 24（1958），158 ff.
[15]ed.Ⅰ.Bogdan，Archiv f.slav.Philol.13（1891），526-35;cf.the important comments of K.Jirecek，‘Zur Würdigung der neuentdeckten bulgarischen Chronik’，ibid.14（1892），235 ff.
[16]ed.V.Jagic，Glasnik 42（1875），223-8，372-7;cf.St.Stanojevic，‘Die Biographie Stephan Lazarevics von Konstantin dem Philosophen als Geschichtsquelle’，Archiv f.slav.Philol.18（1896），409-72.
[17]ed.G.Destunis，st.Petersburg 1858（with Russian trans.）；J.Avramovic，Glasnik 14（1862），233-75（with Serbian trans.）；also Ⅰ.Bekker in CB，Epirotica，Fragmentum Ⅱ，209-39.As part of an extensively planned work，which arose out of the investigations of a reliquary of Epirote provenance now preserved in the cathedral treasure of Cuenca in Spain，a new edition of this chronicle with detailed commentary has been produced by S.Cirac Estopan～an，Bizancio y Espan～a.El legato de la basilissa Maria y de los déspotas Thomas y Esaú de Joannina，Ⅰ-Ⅱ，Barcelona 1943.He also gives by way of an appendix a very cursory history of Epirus.On the Epirote chronicles，cf.L.Vranusis，，Joannina，1962.A critical edition of the text is to follow this comprehensive and fundamental preliminary work.See also the important discussion by G.Schirò，‘Struttura e contenuto della Cronaca dei Tocco’，B 32（1962），203-50，343 f. ↑返回顶部↑
[11]Müller，FHG，v（1870），40-161;English translation，C.T.Riggs，History of Mehmed the Conqueror by Kritovoulos，Princeton;1954;a critical edition of Critobulus，with an introduction and translation in Rumanian has been published by V.Grecu，Critobuli Imbriotae De rebus per annos 1451-1467 a Mechemete Ⅱ gestis，Editio Acad.Reip.Pop.Romaniae，1963.On Critobulus and his work see J.Radonic，‘Kritovul，vizantijskiistorik XV v.’（Critobulus，a Byzantine historian of the fifteenth century），Glas Srpske Kralj Akad.138（1930），59 ff.；Z.V.Udalcova，‘Vizantijskij istorik Kritovul o juznych slavjanach i drugich narodach Balkanskogo poluostrova v XV v.’（The Byzantine historian Critobulus on the southern Slavs and other Balkan peoples in the XVth century），VV 4（1951），91 ff.See also Moravcsik，Byzantinoturcica Ⅰ，2nd ed.，434 ff.
[12]The account of the fall of Constantinople given by the four Byzantine historians is to be found printed all together with an introduction in N.Tomadakes，（1453）。，Athens，1953.A.German translation of the account from the Chronicon Maius attributed to Sphrantzes，with introduction and commentary，is given by E.v.Ivanka，Die letzten Tage von Konstantinopel in Byz.Geschichtsschreiber Ⅰ，Graz-Vienna Cologne，1954.For a Russian translation of the accounts of pseudo-Sphrantzes and Ducas see A.A.Stepanov，‘Vizantijskie istoriki Duka i Frandzi o padenii Konstantinopolia’（The Byzantine Historians Ducas and Phrantzes on the Fall of Constantinople），VV 7（1953），385-430.
An extensive chronicle of the Turkish Sultans up to 1512，written in the Greek vernacular and preserved in the Codex Barberinus gr.111，has been published by G.Zoras，‘Athens，1958.But，as has been shown by E.A.Zachariadou，14（1960），this chronicle goes back to an Italian original.
[13]Nicolo Barbaro，Giornale dell’assedio di Constantinopoli 1453，ed.E.Cornet，Vienna 1856.Special attention should be given to the account which Leonard of Chios sent on 16 August 1453 to Pope Nicholas V;cf.Gy.Moravcsik，‘Bericht des Leonardus Chiensisüber den Fall von Konstantinopel in einer vulgargriechischen Quelle’，BZ 44（1951）（Dolger-Festschrift），428 ff.There is also the interesting account of the Russian Nestor Iskander who took part in the battle for Constantinople on the Turkish side;cf.N.A.Smirnov，‘Istoriceskoe znacene russkoj’Povesti’Nestora Iskandera o vzjatii turkami Konstantinopolja v 1453 g.’（The historical significance of the Russian‘Relatio’of Nestor Iskander about the capture of Constantinople by the Turks in 1453），VV 7（1953），50 ff.For other accounts of the fall of Constantinople by non-Greek eye－witnesses cf.the list in Gibbon-Bury.Ⅶ，332 ff.，and Vasiliev，History（1952），649.On the accounts of the Turkish sources cf.A.Moschopoulos，‘Le siège et la prise de Constantinople selon les sources turques’，Le Cinq-centième anniversaire de la prise de Constantinople，Athens 1953，23 ff.
[14]An important chronicle stretching to 1391，published by J.Müller，‘Byzantinische Analekten’，S.B.d.Wiener Akad.Ⅸ，1852，389 ff.This chronicle is given in a shortened form（omitting the beginning covering the years 1204 to 1282 which is practically valueless）by Lampros-Amantos，Nr.52，pp.88 ff.；cf.also Nr.15，pp.31 ff.This collection contains a number of other chronicles which give information of great imoprtance on the chronology of the Paiaeologian period.Valuable critical comments on this edition are given by P.Wittek，B 12（1937），309 ff.Charanis，‘Short Chronicle’，gives a useful historcal commentary on the.A similar chronicle of significance going to 1352 has been published from a Moscow manuscript by B.Gorjanov，VV 2（1949），276 ff.，with a Russian trans.It is prefaced by an introduction which unfortunately shows no acquaintance with the many other known sources of this type，while the edition of the text and the translation leave much to be desired.A further short chronicle with interesting information on the second half of the fourteenth and the first half of the fifteenth centuries has recently been published by R.J.Loenertz，‘Chronicon breve de Graecorum imperatoribus，ab anno 1341 ad annum 1453 codice Vaticano Graeco 162’，EEBS 28（1958），204 ff.Cf.also the‘Chronicon breve Thessalonicense’published by Loenertz in Démétrius Cydonès，Correspondence Ⅰ，Studi e Testi 186（1956），174，and his article，‘Chroniques breves byzantines’，OCP 24（1958），158 ff.
[15]ed.Ⅰ.Bogdan，Archiv f.slav.Philol.13（1891），526-35;cf.the important comments of K.Jirecek，‘Zur Würdigung der neuentdeckten bulgarischen Chronik’，ibid.14（1892），235 ff.
[16]ed.V.Jagic，Glasnik 42（1875），223-8，372-7;cf.St.Stanojevic，‘Die Biographie Stephan Lazarevics von Konstantin dem Philosophen als Geschichtsquelle’，Archiv f.slav.Philol.18（1896），409-72.
[17]ed.G.Destunis，st.Petersburg 1858（with Russian trans.）；J.Avramovic，Glasnik 14（1862），233-75（with Serbian trans.）；also Ⅰ.Bekker in CB，Epirotica，Fragmentum Ⅱ，209-39.As part of an extensively planned work，which arose out of the investigations of a reliquary of Epirote provenance now preserved in the cathedral treasure of Cuenca in Spain，a new edition of this chronicle with detailed commentary has been produced by S.Cirac Estopan～an，Bizancio y Espan～a.El legato de la basilissa Maria y de los déspotas Thomas y Esaú de Joannina，Ⅰ-Ⅱ，Barcelona 1943.He also gives by way of an appendix a very cursory history of Epirus.On the Epirote chronicles，cf.L.Vranusis，，Joannina，1962.A critical edition of the text is to follow this comprehensive and fundamental preliminary work.See also the important discussion by G.Schirò，‘Struttura e contenuto della Cronaca dei Tocco’，B 32（1962），203-50，343 f. ↑返回顶部↑